<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments for IT Investor	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.itinvestor.co.uk/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.itinvestor.co.uk/</link>
	<description>Exploring the world of investment trusts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2025 11:57:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Trust ISA Millionaires: 2025 edition by ITinvestor		</title>
		<link>https://www.itinvestor.co.uk/2025/04/trust-isa-millionaires-2025-edition/#comment-14363</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ITinvestor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 10:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.itinvestor.co.uk/?p=6461#comment-14363</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.itinvestor.co.uk/2025/04/trust-isa-millionaires-2025-edition/#comment-14362&quot;&gt;M&lt;/a&gt;.

Yes, survivorship bias is something to be aware of here and I have made that point more explicitly in previous reviews of these lists. However, I suspect it&#039;s less of a factor than many passive enthusiasts claim in this instance as it&#039;s rare for a trust to underperform for an extended period before it is taken out and often it is the larger trusts that prosper and the smaller ones that fade away. So if you look at an index of investment trusts, it tends to compare fairly well over long periods.

There&#039;s nothing wrong with a global tracker though and I believe there are usually the best option for most people and especially those who prefer a more hands-off approach.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.itinvestor.co.uk/2025/04/trust-isa-millionaires-2025-edition/#comment-14362">M</a>.</p>
<p>Yes, survivorship bias is something to be aware of here and I have made that point more explicitly in previous reviews of these lists. However, I suspect it&#8217;s less of a factor than many passive enthusiasts claim in this instance as it&#8217;s rare for a trust to underperform for an extended period before it is taken out and often it is the larger trusts that prosper and the smaller ones that fade away. So if you look at an index of investment trusts, it tends to compare fairly well over long periods.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s nothing wrong with a global tracker though and I believe there are usually the best option for most people and especially those who prefer a more hands-off approach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Trust ISA Millionaires: 2025 edition by M		</title>
		<link>https://www.itinvestor.co.uk/2025/04/trust-isa-millionaires-2025-edition/#comment-14362</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[M]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 10:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.itinvestor.co.uk/?p=6461#comment-14362</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Looks like a giant survivorship bias list. Cherry picking the winners after 20 years is not different than cherry-picking 20 stocks that you could have bought and would have made 30% p.a. Could anybody have guessed that DPZ (Domino&#039;s Pizza) would have beaten GOOGL (Google) in long-term capital appreciation?

Instead of trying to guess which ITs will do well (unfortunately nobody can really do that) it will probably be better to just buy VWRL and know that in the long-term you will equivocally beat ALL of these funds, with less volatility and much lower fees. (And even if you won&#039;t beat a few of them, you will still have lower volatility, which means higher Sharpe ratio, which equals beating them).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like a giant survivorship bias list. Cherry picking the winners after 20 years is not different than cherry-picking 20 stocks that you could have bought and would have made 30% p.a. Could anybody have guessed that DPZ (Domino&#8217;s Pizza) would have beaten GOOGL (Google) in long-term capital appreciation?</p>
<p>Instead of trying to guess which ITs will do well (unfortunately nobody can really do that) it will probably be better to just buy VWRL and know that in the long-term you will equivocally beat ALL of these funds, with less volatility and much lower fees. (And even if you won&#8217;t beat a few of them, you will still have lower volatility, which means higher Sharpe ratio, which equals beating them).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Trust ISA Millionaires: 2025 edition by ITinvestor		</title>
		<link>https://www.itinvestor.co.uk/2025/04/trust-isa-millionaires-2025-edition/#comment-14360</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ITinvestor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 07:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.itinvestor.co.uk/?p=6461#comment-14360</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Interesting idea. I&#039;m not entirely sure but I think that would be difficult as not only do you not know what future returns will be, you don&#039;t know how they will be sequenced, and how much you might be able to invest in future.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting idea. I&#8217;m not entirely sure but I think that would be difficult as not only do you not know what future returns will be, you don&#8217;t know how they will be sequenced, and how much you might be able to invest in future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Trust ISA Millionaires: 2025 edition by David Burton		</title>
		<link>https://www.itinvestor.co.uk/2025/04/trust-isa-millionaires-2025-edition/#comment-14355</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Burton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 19:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.itinvestor.co.uk/?p=6461#comment-14355</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks Stuart.

As you point out, it’s interesting that the trusts with the highest total share price return for a lump sum investment (e.g. SST) do not make it to the very top of the table for total value (based on maximum annual ISA subscriptions rather than an initial lump sum). 

So, should we be choosing different trusts to invest in depending on whether we are making a single lump-sum investment or regular contributions?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Stuart.</p>
<p>As you point out, it’s interesting that the trusts with the highest total share price return for a lump sum investment (e.g. SST) do not make it to the very top of the table for total value (based on maximum annual ISA subscriptions rather than an initial lump sum). </p>
<p>So, should we be choosing different trusts to invest in depending on whether we are making a single lump-sum investment or regular contributions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on My 2024 Portfolio Review by ITinvestor		</title>
		<link>https://www.itinvestor.co.uk/2025/01/my-2024-portfolio-review/#comment-13683</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ITinvestor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jan 2025 14:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.itinvestor.co.uk/?p=6433#comment-13683</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[And Happy New Year to you too, X. You definitely have to like doing the extra research and be prepared for the additional ups and downs the approach involves, and that certainly doesn&#039;t suit everyone. Trusts like CGT and RCP will tend to lag in strong bull markets of course.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And Happy New Year to you too, X. You definitely have to like doing the extra research and be prepared for the additional ups and downs the approach involves, and that certainly doesn&#8217;t suit everyone. Trusts like CGT and RCP will tend to lag in strong bull markets of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on My 2024 Portfolio Review by X		</title>
		<link>https://www.itinvestor.co.uk/2025/01/my-2024-portfolio-review/#comment-13682</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[X]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jan 2025 13:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.itinvestor.co.uk/?p=6433#comment-13682</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks for your transparency and happy new year!

Respect for keeping at it with your IT portfolio.

I&#039;m close to throwing the tower after being mostly invested in CGT/RCP (and a few other ITs I sold last few years- BSRC, SSON, HICL, HFEL) . Sold all my CGT a month ago, and since 2 years buying only cheap ETFs a la VWRL/VWCE. 

The moment RCP closes the discount I will dump it as well, as psychologically I can&#039;t sell it at such a discount, seems unwise. 

It was an interesting experiment but I don&#039;t know if it&#039;s worth all the effort in analyzing all these ITs when a dumb ETF ends up beating basically all of them. 

Let&#039;s see how 2025 goes...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your transparency and happy new year!</p>
<p>Respect for keeping at it with your IT portfolio.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m close to throwing the tower after being mostly invested in CGT/RCP (and a few other ITs I sold last few years- BSRC, SSON, HICL, HFEL) . Sold all my CGT a month ago, and since 2 years buying only cheap ETFs a la VWRL/VWCE. </p>
<p>The moment RCP closes the discount I will dump it as well, as psychologically I can&#8217;t sell it at such a discount, seems unwise. </p>
<p>It was an interesting experiment but I don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;s worth all the effort in analyzing all these ITs when a dumb ETF ends up beating basically all of them. </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s see how 2025 goes&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on My Q3 2024 Portfolio Review by Andrew		</title>
		<link>https://www.itinvestor.co.uk/2024/10/my-q3-2024-portfolio-review/#comment-13202</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2024 21:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.itinvestor.co.uk/?p=6368#comment-13202</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[RIT mentioned at the last AGM that they would be increasing marketing and revamping the website, so good to see progress .....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RIT mentioned at the last AGM that they would be increasing marketing and revamping the website, so good to see progress &#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on My H1 2024 Portfolio Review by Anon		</title>
		<link>https://www.itinvestor.co.uk/2024/07/my-h1-2024-portfolio-review/#comment-13191</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Sep 2024 16:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.itinvestor.co.uk/?p=6334#comment-13191</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[KR1 is about to pump in the next few months IMO and could easily achieve a 100% return from here.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KR1 is about to pump in the next few months IMO and could easily achieve a 100% return from here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on My H1 2024 Portfolio Review by ITinvestor		</title>
		<link>https://www.itinvestor.co.uk/2024/07/my-h1-2024-portfolio-review/#comment-12836</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ITinvestor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2024 07:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.itinvestor.co.uk/?p=6334#comment-12836</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[No plans to reconsider MYI at this stage but will keep half an eye on it to see how the new management duo are doing. THRG obviously has a lot in common with BRSC but I have tended to slightly favour the latter due to its simpler structure of long-only rather than the long-short model, largely down to personal preference. If we do have a strong bull run in UK small caps then THRG could perform a little better of course.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No plans to reconsider MYI at this stage but will keep half an eye on it to see how the new management duo are doing. THRG obviously has a lot in common with BRSC but I have tended to slightly favour the latter due to its simpler structure of long-only rather than the long-short model, largely down to personal preference. If we do have a strong bull run in UK small caps then THRG could perform a little better of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
